Evidence Rating System
The rating measures the strength of surviving documentation. It does not rate how interesting or dramatic a story is.
The Giants Collection · Research Archive
The GiantsArchive
Reports · Records · Remains
The question is not whether stories exist. The question is what survives behind them.
Archive Statement
Preserve the record. Test the evidence.
For centuries, accounts of unusually large human beings have appeared in Scripture, ancient traditions, archaeological reports, historical records, and newspapers.
This collection does not begin by assuming that every account is true. It preserves the surviving record and separates what was reported from what can still be demonstrated.
What was reported?Who reported it?When and where?What evidence still survives?
Archive Directory
Follow the evidence
The archive begins with the textual record, then moves outward into historical reports, measurements, provenance, and case-by-case documentation.
01 · Open
The Scriptural Record
Biblical passages, ancient terminology, and related textual witnesses presented by source class.
Enter Gallery → 02 · OpenGiant Identity Wall
Nephilim, Anakim, Rephaim, Emim, Zamzummim, Gibborim, Og, Goliath, and Gath.
Study the Names → 03 · OpenNorth American Collection
Documented reports organized by incident, place, date, people, institutions, and surviving evidence.
Browse Case Files → 04 · OpenEvidence Rating System
A consistent five-level scale for separating anecdotes from strongly documented historical cases.
See the Criteria ↓ 05 · OpenThe Press Record
Original newspaper material, transcriptions, source metadata, and connections between reports.
Enter the Archive → 06 · OpenGiants Through the Centuries
Twenty-five named writers and researchers who explicitly defended the supernatural Genesis 6 interpretation and a real giant tradition.
Enter Research Gallery → 07 · OpenThe Measurement Room
A visual scale distinguishing unusual human stature from extraordinary skeletal accounts.
Enter Measurement Room → 08 · OpenWhere Are the Remains?
Known repositories, transfers, reburials, losses, private collections, and under continued study provenance.
Begin Provenance Investigation → 09 · OpenThe Curator's Table
The strongest cases are selected for surviving documentation—not for the most dramatic account.
View Current Cases ↓
Museum Method
How the archive evaluates a report
Evidence Types
Every item is labeled by what it actually is so a newspaper report is never presented as though it were a surviving specimen.
- Newspaper
- Archaeological Report
- Institutional Record
- Historical Book
- Field Report
- Oral Tradition
- Photograph
- Skeletal Measurement
- Secondary Retelling
- Other / under study
The Curator's Table
Cases already in the archive
These are current working case files from the museum database. Ratings shown here are provisional and can change as original sources are added or challenged.
Case File · 1902
Bromley Sand Pit
Historical skeletal report.
★★☆☆☆ Case File · 1908Mexico Cave / Clapp
Newspaper-linked discovery report.
★★☆☆☆ Case File · 1910Shoshone Cave
Reported giant skeleton discovery.
★★☆☆☆ Case File · 1924Salmon River
Prehistoric human remains report.
★★☆☆☆ Case File · 1940Morhiss Skull
Documented newspaper case file.
★★☆☆☆